Search this site
Embedded Files
  • Home
  • Submission
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guidelines
    • Contact Us
 
  • Home
  • Submission
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guidelines
    • Contact Us
  • More
    • Home
    • Submission
    • Current
    • Archives
    • About
      • About Journal
      • Editorial Board
      • Author Guidelines
      • Contact Us

Home  /  Archives  /  Vol. 6 No. 2: Nov 2025 (on process)  /  Articles

Legal Reformulation of the Transfer of Rights To Guaranteed Objects Through Foreseen Collateral 

Lisa Mega Yuniar
Brawijaya University


Reka Dewantara
Brawijaya University


Arini Jauharoh
Brawijaya University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v6i2.53696

ABSTRACT

Foreclosed Assets is one of the mechanisms used by banks in settling non-performing loans without having to go through lengthy and complicated auction procedures. Although the Foreclosed Assets mechanism has been regulated under Article 12A of Law No. 4 of 2023 on Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector, in practice—particularly in the context of bankruptcy—there remains legal uncertainty. This is due to inconsistent regulations between the Mortgage Law, the Banking Law, and Supreme Court Circular No. 3 of 2023. This research aims to analyze the Foreclosed Assets mechanism juridically within the context of bankruptcy and to formulate a reformulation of legal arrangements concerning the transfer of rights over collateral objects through the Foreclosed Assets mechanism to ensure legal certainty. This study employs a normative juridical method using statute and conceptual approaches. The results of this study show that the implementation of Foreclosed Assets, both through auction and outside auction, has different legal consequences. Foreclosed Assets conducted through auction has a sufficiently strong legal basis, while Foreclosed Assets conducted outside auction—which generally uses Sale and Purchase Agreement and Power of Attorney to Sell—still presents legal uncertainty. This is due to the absence of technical regulations specifically governing the procedures and forms of documents in the implementation of Foreclosed Assets outside auction. Furthermore, the use of PPJB as the legal basis for the transfer of rights in Foreclosed Assets practice has the potential to conflict with the pactum commissorium principle as regulated in the Mortgage Law. This reformulation is essential to clarify the legal position of banks over acquired collateral as well as to uniformly regulate valid legal document formats in the Foreclosed Assets mechanism, thereby providing legal certainty for banks, debtors, notaries, receivers, and other related parties. 

KEYWORDS: Foreclosed Assets, Bankruptcy, Reformulation of Legal Arrangements, Legal Certainty, Banking.

PDF

Published
2025-10-29

Issue
Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Nov

Page
91 - 111

Section
Articles

License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

About Journal

Focus and Scope

Editorial Board

Peer Reviewers

Indexing

Contact Us

Ethics & Policies

Publication Ethics

Peer Reviewer Process

Open Access Statement

Copyright Notice

Plagiarism Policy

For Author

Author Guidelines

Journal Template

Article Processing Charge

Statement of Originality Form

For Reviewer

Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Assessment Form

Become a Reviewer

© 2026 Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 
Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Report abuse